The Most Deceptive Criticism Directed at Greta Thunberg in the Current Year

Advertisement

The recent headline in the Boston Herald stated, “Greta Thunberg deals a cruel blow to the Jews,” attributing this to the events of October 7 and comparing her actions to those of Hamas attackers. This comparison seems rather gruesome and an inappropriate trivialization of severe war crimes.

Surprisingly, Greta Thunberg, known for her environmental activism and global youth movement to address the climate crisis, found herself accused of antisemitism. This accusation wasn’t limited to tabloids but came from voices perceived as respectable. Even the Simon Wiesenthal Center, a renowned organization, condemned her for supposedly facilitating antisemitic tropes during a climate rally in Amsterdam, linking it to a “pro-Hamas event.” Germany’s commissioner for Jewish life and antisemitism echoed similar sentiments, questioning if Thunberg was antisemitic or just naive.

Thunberg’s alleged crime? Holding a sign stating, “I stand with Gaza,” advocating for a cease-fire on social media, and sharing a platform with a Palestinian activist. Such actions, which primarily signify solidarity, were construed as antisemitic by some due to the ongoing narrative associating opposition to the Israeli occupation of Gaza with antisemitism.

Advertisement

However, this view is highly contentious and rejected by numerous Jewish intellectuals, activists, and organizations, including Jewish Voices for Peace, who assert that anti-Zionism shouldn’t equate to antisemitism. In contrast to accusations, Thunberg’s calls for a cease-fire and solidarity with Gaza aren’t inherently antisemitic.

Furthermore, a plush octopus in one of Thunberg’s photos led to undue controversy. While the octopus had been historically used as an antisemitic symbol in propaganda, its presence in Thunberg’s photo seemed unintentional and was explained to have significance in the autistic community. Nevertheless, she removed it and apologized for any misunderstanding.

Some climate activists, particularly in Germany and Israel, criticized Thunberg for her stance on Gaza, perceiving it as divisive within the climate movement. Yet, advocating for an end to the massacre of civilians and the occupation of Gaza seems a reasonable and humane stance, resonating with many globally who seek justice and fairness.

Critically, the occupation of Gaza is more than just a political issue—it intertwines with environmental crises. Palestinians, among the most vulnerable in climate change, face water and electricity restrictions enforced by the Israeli government. Additionally, the conflict exacerbates regional warming by destroying soil and olive trees.

The reactions to Thunberg’s stance reflect the complexities and misunderstandings surrounding the Palestinian cause and antisemitism. However, her resilience in emphasizing peace and solidarity amidst slander illustrates a principled response to baseless accusations, continuing her mission against climate injustice.